Rice calls Syria votes a 'disgrace'
UNITED NATIONS — Outgoing U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice said on Tuesday that the U.N. Security Council's failure to take action to stop the conflict in Syria is “a moral and strategic disgrace that history will judge harshly.”
She said at her final news conference before starting her new job as national security adviser on July 1 that the paralysis of the U.N.'s most important body is “a stain” on the council — even though she maintained that the United States and its allies were not responsible.
Rice blamed three double vetoes by Russia and China of resolutions aimed at pressuring Syria's President Bashar Assad to end the violence, even though they didn't contain sanctions.
She expressed hope that the Syrian people ultimately will be able to chart their own future.
“I think we've seen in this region of the world and many other parts of the world that these struggles can be long and costly, but rarely can I think of an instance in recent history where at the end of the day ... the unified aspirations of a people for freedom and to chart their own future are ultimately suppressed,” Rice said.
She wouldn't comment the refusal of China or Russia to extradite National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, and dismissed criticism of human rights in the United States by those countries and Ecuador, where Snowden has sought asylum, saying: “I think the records of other countries speak for themselves.”
Rice called the U.S. relationship with Russia “complex and multifaceted,” explaining that during her 4 1⁄2 years at the U.N. there have been disagreements with Moscow but the vast majority of accomplishments by the Security Council “have been accomplishment in partnership and with the support of the majority of the council including the veto-wielding members and that includes Russia.”
In the future, she said, there will undoubtedly be important issues of divergence and disagreement.
But Rice stressed: “I'm not prepared to predict that that is inevitable, and certainly not across the board, where on issues as important as Iran and North Korea and many others we have been able to find common ground.”
She listed the council's imposition of very tough sanctions on Iran and North Korea among the major accomplishments during her years as ambassador along with the council's authorization of military action to protect civilians in Libya, the birth of the new country of South Sudan, the political transformation in Yemen, the advance of women's equality and the U.N.'s “remarkable shift” on the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered people.
Yet, she said, “conflict, abuse, atrocities, poverty and suffering persist in too many places,” particularly Syria.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.