Queen Elizabeth's income about to rise
LONDON — Buckingham Palace accounts showed on Thursday that Queen Elizabeth II had a good year financially — the monarch will receive a 5 percent income boost for record portfolio profits.
The Crown Estate, including much of London's Regent Street and Windsor Great Park, made $380 million in the last financial year, a 5.2 percent annual increase.
The queen receives 15 percent of Crown Estate profits through a grant supplied by the British government that funds the monarch's spending as head of state.
The annual grant is $55 million but will rise to $57.7 million in 2014, representing a 5 percent increase.
Keeper of the Privy Purse Alan Reid said in a statement that a significant part of the grant increase would be used on a backlog of essential property maintenance at working Royal Palaces.
Anti-monarchy activists Republic called on the queen to reject the 5 percent increase.
Spokesman Graham Smith said in a statement: “The Crown Estate is not — and never has been — the personal property of the royals. To claim that it should fund their lavish lifestyle is deceitful and dishonest.”
The Crown Estate was created in 1760 when George III agreed the crown lands would be managed on behalf of the government.
The estate includes 15 retails parks across the country, around half of the U.K.'s coastal waters and royal parks such as Hyde Park in London.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Afghan forces may resume night raids
- Brits blame web services in soldier’s death
- Teen girls’ suicide bombs rip into Nigerian village marketplace
- Abduction in Mexico to spur police, judicial system changes
- Islamic State got up to $45M in ransom payments
- With sanctions, sliding oil prices, Russia losing more than $100B a year, finance minister says
- Nuclear talks with Iran extended until March; GOP senators call for more sanctions
- 2 female bombers kill 30 in Nigeria
- Islamic State drive for Kobani blunted
- Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu agrees to delay ‘nationality’ bill
- 3 Americans, Briton killed in Jerusalem synagogue attack