Share This Page

Sharing information critical, U.S. troops tell Afghans

| Saturday, June 29, 2013, 6:06 p.m.
Two soldiers from the 4th Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division pause during a patrol on Saturday, May 25, 2013 in Khost Province, Afghanistan. In a massive restructuring, the Army announced they will slash the number of active duty combat brigades from 45 to 33 as the service moves forward with a plan to cut the size of the service by 80,000. The 4th Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division, based at Fort Campbell, Ky., and currently deployed to Afghanistan, is one of those brigades slated to be inactivated by 2017. (AP Photo/Kristin M. Hall)

CAMP CLARK, Afghanistan — With Afghan military and police now responsible for security in their country, U.S. Army advisers from the 4th Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division, are encouraging the Afghans to share information in a combined effort to fight insurgents.

That's no easy task in a country where security intelligence is passed by word of mouth rather than in written reports and military officials say there is a tendency to hold onto information rather than share it.

Lt. Col. Thomas Sutton, commander of the 1st Squadron, 61st Cavalry Regiment, based at Fort Campbell, Ky., is leading a security force assistance team in Khost province that works with the Afghan National Army and the Afghan Uniformed Police, whose responsibilities and geographical areas sometime overlap.

With plans to pull most U.S. combat troops out of the country by the end of 2014, coalition forces have moved to advisory roles to help the Afghan security forces take over security after nearly 12 years of war in Afghanistan. The Taliban continues to make attacks on Kabul and other parts of the country, even as President Obama tries to get Afghan President Hamid Karzai to sit down to talk reconciliation with the Taliban.

Sutton said the Afghan military and police have a native understanding and awareness of the security concerns in their areas. The challenge is getting all the agencies on the same page and working together to coordinate patrols, operations and planning.

“Believe it or not, they have very good intel,” Sutton said. “You wouldn't think it because sometimes for them holding information is power. Sharing it is giving it away.”

The Afghan security forces don't rely on data and intelligence reports as the coalition forces do when planning operations; their operations center is often just the commander working with multiple cellphones, Sutton said.

“They don't have it written down, and they don't have these reports,” said Sutton, 41, from Spokane. “They don't generate computer analysis.”

The advisers recently met with the police chief in the Mandozai district of Khost province, Maj. Jaglan Babrak Wardak. The district is a stopping point for insurgent fighters on the main road heading into the provincial capital, Khost city. Their purpose was to share information with the police commander and ask him to attend weekly security meetings with other military and police officers to share information.

The Mandozai police had shown their willingness to help their counterparts when an American platoon was attacked a few days earlier. 1st Lt. Brandon Scaturro, 24, of New York City thanked them for coming to the aid of his platoon

“We have to join together,” said Wardak, the police commander, through a translator.

At the weekly security meetings, an Afghan National Army reconnaissance company and two police districts each send their intelligence officers and discuss previous operations, security priorities in the area and planned operations, said Army Capt. Marc Dudek, who works with the advisory team.

“I think when they see other people wearing the uniform, it helps with the confidence,” said Dudek, a 29-year-old from Midlothian, Texas. “They are part of a team, and they are working toward the same goal.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.