Anti-Obama protesters in South Africa dispersed by force
By USA Today
Published: Saturday, June 29, 2013, 9:33 p.m.
JOHANNESBURG — Police fired rubber bullets and a stun grenade into a crowd of hundreds of protesters before President Obama arrived at the University of Johannesburg on Saturday.
The crowd quickly scattered as police officers walked up the street pushing protesters away with shotguns.
“I feel my rights are being infringed,” said 24-year-old Bilaal Qibr, who was at the protest. “We can't protest anymore. Personally, I feel like this is an extension of the U.S.”
Protests were planned at the university over Obama's visit and the news that he was to receive an honorary doctorate on Saturday.
“They don't believe Obama deserves that award. The U.S. position and its relationship with Israel has created a problem,” said Levy Masete, president of the Student Representative Council. “The students say, ‘Stop the oppression in Palestine,' and you want to honor this man who is making this oppression possible.”
Obama dismissed suggestions that he was only investing time in Africa's economy as a response to the increased focus on the continent by China. He called on Africans to make sure that countries seeking an economic foothold on the continent are making a “good deal for Africa.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pope Francis is Time’s Person of the Year
- Syrian opposition activist goes missing
- Uruguay OKs 1st national market for legal pot
- Egypt strikes a perilous repose
- Mexico may open up oil production
- Protesters rip fences, Chevron’s plans
- Defense Secretary Hagel skips visit with Afghan President Karzai
- Taste of free enterprise whets Cubans’ appetite
- Iran presses ahead with uranium
- Autobahn toll plan attracts backlash
- Bali summit yields global trade deal