Brazil protests target soccer stadium
RIO DE JANEIRO — More than 5,000 anti-government protesters marched on Sunday near the Maracana stadium before a major international soccer match, venting their anger about the billions of dollars the Brazilian government is spending on major sporting events rather than public services.
Sharp clashes broke out several hundred yards from the stadium about 30 minutes before the game, as a minor scuffle between police and a few protesters escalated.
Officers quickly quashed the unrest, unleashing a barrage of tear gas canisters and stun grenades, scattering the crowd, but not before some protesters retaliated with Molotov cocktails and powerful fireworks. At one point, an officer ran into a nearby gas station and told several people holed up inside that they needed to get out or they were “all going to die here!”
Though smaller, the march was the latest in a wave of protests across the country in recent weeks. Many are calling the protest movement the biggest in decades, with more than 1 million people taking to the streets nationwide on the night of June 20.
The demonstrations have dwindled in size and frequency in recent days as officials from all levels of government have scrambled to calm public anger with woeful public services and a heavy tax burden.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Afghan parliament approves U.S., NATO agreements
- North Korean student escapes abduction bid in Paris
- Chinese state media give profs a chilling warning
- 28 non-Muslims killed in attack on Kenyan bus by Somalia’s Islamic terrorists
- Romanian leader edged out in neck-and-neck runoff
- Homes of Palestinians linked to attacks targeted by Israel
- Israeli mayor suspends jobs of some Arabs, citing synagogue attack
- Annual global obesity costs rise to $2T
- Crowds in Ukraine show lingering tensions amid Biden visit to back pro-West officials
- Russian diplomat Lavrov accuses West of seeking ‘regime changee_SSRq