U.S. drone strike in Pakistan kills 17
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A U.S. drone leveled the home of an Afghan militant commander late Tuesday in the northwest Pakistani tribal region of North Waziristan, killing 17 people in the year's deadliest strike to date.
The drone fired four missiles at the residential compound of Haji Sharif-ullah, a senior operative of the Haqqani network based in the Sirai Darpakhel neighborhood of Miranshah, the administrative headquarters of North Waziristan, according to residents and security officials based there. Sharif-ullah was not among the casualties.
The Haqqani network is a particularly virulent Afghan militant faction allied with the Taliban. It is based in North Waziristan and triggers attacks from there and neighboring Pakistani tribal areas bordering eastern Afghan provinces.
The drone attack was the third against targets in North Waziristan since a May general election won by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz party of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.
Pakistan's Foreign Affairs Ministry reacted mildly on Wednesday to the latest strike, reiterating Sharif's stance that drone attacks were not conducive to Islamabad's efforts to persuade the Afghan Taliban and its allies to participate in peace talks.
The previous two drone strikes had eliminated insurgents of the self-described Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), including its deputy chief, Waliur Rehman, and effectively scuttled Sharif's plans to hold exploratory peace talks. He reacted last month by announcing he had ordered an end to Pakistan's previous policy of publicly condemning drone strikes as violations of its sovereignty that cause civilian deaths while its military has been complicit with the CIA.
U.S. intelligence reports reviewed by McClatchy in April provided the first official confirmation that the CIA and the Pakistani military's Inter Services Intelligence directorate, or ISI, have run joint operations.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.