Taliban: Qatar office 'does not represent us'
KABUL — Two weeks after peace talks with the Taliban dramatically imploded, the insurgent group's office in Qatar remains an apt symbol for Afghanistan's diplomatic stalemate. Behind high walls in residential Doha, it hasn't been opened for negotiations, and it hasn't been forced to close.
For now, it is a would-be negotiations center — years in the making — that conducts no negotiations. Americans and Afghans are unsure whether it ever will. But closing it could preclude a political solution to this country's 11-year war.
With such high stakes, neither U.S. nor Afghan officials are willing to pull the plug on the Doha talks, even though recent Taliban statements and actions offer little reason to be optimistic.
The Taliban shocked representatives of both nations when it displayed the organization's flag during its first news conference in the Qatar office and spoke in front of a banner with the words, “The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,” the name of its regime when it ruled Afghanistan in the 1990s.
U.S. officials said the parties had agreed that the office would be called a “political bureau of the Afghan Taliban.” The Afghan government considered the banner and flag an affront to its legitimacy.
President Hamid Karzai responded by not only refusing to participate in any talks with the Taliban, but also by halting negotiations over a long-term security agreement with the United States. Those talks remain on hold, but he appears to have marginally cooled off, claiming to have made contact with Taliban leaders in Pakistan who offered a more positive stance toward talks than the representatives in Doha.
“A number of Taliban leaders contacted the president and showed their dissatisfaction about the Qatar office,” said Karzai's spokesman, Aimal Faizi. “They said foreign hands are behind the office and that they do not represent us.”
At a news conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron last week, Karzai said: “A window of opportunity is open, and I will urge all of those who renounce violence, who respect the constitution, who want to have a voice in the future prosperity of this country to seize that opportunity.”
Karzai said in a statement on Thursday that he won't resume long-term security negotiations with the United States until his government's negotiators meet with the Taliban — a prospect that has raised some concerns about the American ability to maintain an enduring presence in Afghanistan beyond 2014.
“The idea of making a condition on the bilateral agreement when the Taliban decide to meet with the High Peace Council puts way too much power in (the Taliban's) hands,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., after meeting with Karzai.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Early Mona Lisa’ painting traced to English noble
- Kurds bring fight to Islamic State in contested Iraqi town
- Arrests made in Pakistan school massacre
- Nigeria’s Islamic terrorist Boko Haram group poses threat to Cameroon
- Exit poll: Ex-regime official Essebsi is Tunisia’s new president
- Australian woman denied mental health court hearing in slayings of 8 children
- Pakistan fervent about anti-blasphemy law
- Liberia holds senate elections delayed by Ebola epidemic
- Hope for better days in Pakistan shattered in school attack
- Why was Sydney attacker — who had extensive criminal past — on the streets?
- Female bishop a first for Church of England