Britain sees gold in shale gas and oil belts
Shale gas and oil may hold the key to Britain's energy troubles.
The rolling countryside south of London is called the stockbroker belt for the residents who pay 50 percent above the British average to live in pristine villages. But there's shale oil under them there lawns.
Two areas of Surrey and Sussex hold 700 million barrels of recoverable shale oil, or more than a year's supply for Britain, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates.
The advent of drilling near mansions in the Wessex and Weald basins may widen the nation's shale energy debate, which has focused on gas in northwest England, hundreds of miles from London.
“The rock in the Weald is splendid; it's extremely good for shale oil,” said Fivos Spathopoulos, a visiting lecturer of petroleum geology at London's Imperial College who studied the basin for about seven years. “If it works, it'll be big, but we won't know exactly how big until we drill.”
The British government plans tax breaks to stimulate a shale industry that can buoy domestic supply as North Sea output dwindles and imports rise.
Celtique plans to drill a well next year at Fernhurst in West Sussex, where the average house price tops $722,000.
The British government said in June that shale gas fields in northern England are twice as large as estimated, potentially big enough to meet demand for 47 years. It said explorers have promised incentives, including a 1 percent share of production revenue to communities where shale gas is pumped.
Proponents say the benefits could mirror the United States where the exploitation of shale formations helped the country overtake Russia as the biggest producer of natural gas in 2009 and boosted crude oil output.
But some residents fear groundwater contamination.
“I have grave concerns about our water supplies,” said Anne Hall, a former county councilor in Balcombe in West Sussex, where driller Cuadrilla Resources plans an exploratory well and “No fracking” signs are widespread.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.