Mexican elections prove testy
MEXICO CITY — Elections for governor of a key border state as well as for legislatures and mayorships in 13 other states on Sunday have raised tempers, along with fears that violence may be becoming endemic in local Mexican politics.
At stake is the governorship of Baja California, the first statehouse won by the opposition in 1989. The ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI, is looking to win back Baja California, while the conservative National Action Party desperately wants to hold on to the governor's office in a state that is home to key cities such as Tijuana and Mexicali.
A loss in Baja after 24 years in power there could be devastating for National Action leader Gustavo Madero, who has formed a working alliance with PRI President Enrique Pena Nieto to enact key national reforms.
Analysts say defeat could lead National Action to pull out of the alliance, known as the Pact for Mexico, which has achieved reforms in public education and telecom laws but still faces hurdles in energy and tax reform.
“Given the symbolic importance of Baja California for National Action, if it loses this this election, I really think you could see a significant impact on the Pact for Mexico,” said Rene Torres-Ruiz, professor of political science at the Ibero-American University.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Libyan militia accuses Egypt, United Arab Emirates of airstrikes
- Police, government blamed in U.K. child sex exploitation
- Iceland volcano shaken below, but doesn’t stir above
- Afghan candidate threatens boycott of election audit
- No clear victor in Hamas-Israel conflict
- Peace plan backed, Ukraine says