Study links China air pollution, shorter lives
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, July 8, 2013, 10:09 p.m.
BEIJING — A new study links heavy air pollution from coal burning to shorter lives in northern China.
Researchers estimate that the half-billion people living there in the 1990s will live an average of 5½ fewer years than their southern counterparts because they breathed dirtier air.
China made the comparison possible. For decades, a now-discontinued government policy provided free coal for heating, but only in the colder north. Researchers found significant differences in particle pollution of the air and life expectancy in the two regions, and said the results could be used to extrapolate the effects of such pollution on lifespans elsewhere.
The study by researchers from China, Israel and the United States was published on Tuesday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Previous studies have found that pollution affects human health, but “the deeper and ultimately more important question is the impact on life expectancy,” said one of the authors, Michael Greenstone, a professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Suspected attack leader still ‘free’
- American teacher shot dead in Benghazi
- Panel to advise Pope Francis on sex abuse
- mexico Carjackers likely to die …
- American held in North Korea offers apology
- Thai protesters seek to topple PM
- Robert Gumbita retains Mt. Pleasant School Board president seat
- U.S. can’t get China to yield on contentious air zone
- ‘Dangerous’ radioactive material found in Mexico
- 3 women held for 30 years in London home, police say
- Benghazi dangers frighten diplomats