U.S. urges captive's release in Colombia
By The Associated Press
Published: Saturday, July 20, 2013, 8:36 p.m.
BOGOTA, Colombia — A former U.S. Marine, whom Colombia's main insurgency says it “captured” a month ago in a turbulent southeastern region, is not a member of the U.S. mission and should be released immediately, Washington's ambassador said Saturday.
The rebels had offered to free Kevin Scott Sutay as a good-faith gesture in announcing on their website that he was in their custody.
The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, said Sutay had described himself as a 2010-2011 veteran of the Afghan conflict who had left the armed forces in March.
The group did not disclose how it came into possession of Sutay but suggested he was “a mercenary.”
U.S. Ambassador Michael McKinley denied that, saying Sutay was not an active member of the military.
“We understand that (he) was on a trip as a private citizen through Latin America,” the ambassador told reporters when questioned about Sutay after attending a Mass marking Colombia's independence day. “He is a citizen who has nothing to do with Colombia's internal conflict.”
The Pentagon on Saturday referred queries about Sutay's military background to the U.S. State Department and the embassy in Bogota.
An embassy spokeswoman, Erika Avila, said she had no additional information to offer on Sutay. It was not clear what he was doing in the Guaviare region, which is not a tourist region.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pope Francis, huge crowd joyously celebrate Easter
- Mexico clears way for foreign investors in shale oil drilling
- Holocaust survivors taxed, student finds in search of Amsterdam city archives
- Russia’s push into Ukraine leads NATO to increase its Baltics presence
- Missing plane’s black box batteries feared to have died
- Ex-Obama campaign strategists to battle each other in British election
- Third mate unfamiliar with waters where South Korean ferry sank
- People’s Republic of Donetsk: 1 government building in eastern Ukraine city
- Expert witness for Pistorius blistered again
- In Egypt, government watchdog Genena hit by backlash in uncovering corruption
- South Korean ferry captain arrested; crew’s actions faulted in sinking