MEXICO CITY — The Obama administration said Sunday that it's working with Mexico to bring new charges against a drug lord who persuaded a court to overturn his 40-year sentence in the kidnap, torture and murder of a U.S. anti-drug agent.
The chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security said Rafael Caro Quintero's release on Friday was a test of Mexico's new president, who must see that Caro Quintero is put back behind bars.
National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said the United States is deeply concerned by Caro Quintero's release and that the United States is working with Mexican authorities to make that those responsible for the 1985 murder of Drug Enforcement Administration agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena face justice in the U.S.
Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon said Attorney General Eric Holder is in touch with Mexican authorities to convey U.S. concerns about Caro Quintero's release. The Mexican Attorney General's Office declined comment.
Rep. Michael McCaul, a Republican from Texas, said the appeals court's decision to overturn Caro Quintero's sentence was “insulting.”
McCaul said that Caro Quintero is “a cold-blooded killer and he's done 28 years.” He added that “it's not a good sign for the new administration right now.” McCaul predicted a “negative impact” on U.S.-Mexico relations “if the Mexican attorney general doesn't pursue additional federal charges or help with extradition.”
The three-judge court ruled that Caro Quintero should have been prosecuted in state not federal court, and overturned his sentence. He left prison Friday and has not been heard from since.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.