More tank leaks found at nuclear plant
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, Sept. 2, 2013, 9:42 p.m.
TOKYO — Japan's top nuclear regulator raised safety concerns on Monday about hastily built storage tanks and their foundations at the damaged Fukushima Dai-Ichi power plant after signs of new leaks of radioactive water.
The latest leak was found during the weekend in a connecting pipe. The plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co., said it suspects there may have been leaks from three storage tanks because elevated radioactivity was detected near them. The levels were not considered deadly.
Nuclear Regulation Authority Chairman Shunichi Tanaka told a news conference that the small leak and possible other leaks have added to concerns about the plant's stability.
They follow a major leak two weeks ago. Tepco reported a loss of 300 tons of highly radioactive water from a steel tank on Aug. 19, saying most of it is believed to have seeped underground but some might have escaped into the sea. The company has yet to determine the cause or exactly where the water went.
The leakage of water that had been used to cool the plant's three melted reactor cores triggered fears of similar leaks from more than 300 other similar tanks. The tanks are part of about 1,000 tanks holding 330,000 tons of contaminated water at the plant, where the radioactive waste water from the reactors grows by 400 tons daily.
The latest leaks have triggered further concerns about the plant's ability to manage the contaminated water. Experts have said that radioactive water from underground and utility tunnels connected to reactors and turbine buildings has been leaking into the sea for some time.
Tanaka said he believed the discoveries of the subsequent leak and signs of possible additional leaks were the result of closer inspections after the large leak two weeks ago. That leak was the worst from a tank at the plant, which was badly damaged by a March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.
Tanaka raised concerns about the safety of the foundations of the tank sites. Tepco recently revealed that one of the tank sites had partially sunk during a test to see if a tank was watertight.
“Because those tanks were built in an emergency situation, it is questionable whether sufficient ground surveys were conducted,” Tanaka said. “We believe experienced companies did a fine job, but we still have concerns and we must step up our watch for leaks.”
Tepco said the minor leak found Saturday had stopped after workers tightened bolts on the seam of a connecting pipe. Radioactive water inside the suspected tanks was to be moved to nearby tanks as a precaution.
The investigation into the tanks has revealed sloppy record keeping and tank management by Tepco. The company has acknowledged that it used to assign only two workers to visually inspect all 1,000 tanks in about two hours until the leak, and none of the tanks had water gauges. Tepco has increased the patrol staff to nearly 60 and is adding other early detection measures.
Tepco also said it overlooked several signs of leaks — increases of radioactivity near the tanks and higher exposure levels for workers — for more than a month.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pa. nonprofit group committed to Afghanistan despite hospital shooting
- Obama to try balancing act in visit to Asian allies
- Sri Lanka to boot British tourist over Buddha tattoo
- Mexico clears way for foreign investors in shale oil drilling
- Russia vows retaliation would be swift
- Shakespeare’s Globe taking ‘Hamlet’ to 205 nations