Pakistani parties back government peace talks
ISLAMABAD — Pakistani political leaders on Monday endorsed government efforts to negotiate with militants in the tribal regions while distancing themselves from a war that they portrayed as being foisted on them by the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.
Pakistan for years has been battling militants in the northeastern part of the country who do not recognize the authority of the government.
Thousands of civilians and members of the security forces have been killed in bombings and shootings carried out by the militants, but the war has been unpopular with many in the country who see it as a battle against them at the behest of the United States and Afghanistan.
The announcement was made after a meeting of politicians from the major political parties in the prime minister's residence to discuss the country's precarious security situation. The meeting was attended by the head of the Pakistani army, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, and the head of the Inter-Services Intelligence, the country's spy agency.
In a statement, the political leaders called upon the government to “initiate dialogue with all the stakeholders” and authorize the government to do what was necessary to bring about negotiations.
“We declare that we shall ourselves determine the means and mode of fighting this war in our national interest and shall not be guided by the United States of America or any other country in this regard,” the statement said.
The statement condemned America's use of drones in the tribal region to kill militants.
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif took office in June saying he supported talks rather than military operations to bring about peace.
The Pakistani Taliban, the main militant group fighting in the tribal regions, had rejected Sharif's talk of negotiations. But a spokesman for the group on Monday welcomed the announcement.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Gunman in Ottawa attack had been waiting for passport to go to Syria
- U.S. airstrikes beat back Islamic State’s push for Mosul dam
- China’s Communist Party angles to improve judiciary
- Teen girls found no roadblock to flights
- Saudis tell women: Don’t defy and drive
- Deadly crash into train station prompts crackdown in Jerusalem
- Canadians more fearful, aware after ‘very rare’ attack in Ottawa
- Loophole rewards expelled Nazi suspects with Social Security benefits
- Iran considers compromise offer on nuclear program
- Shiites killed in series of attacks on Baghdad
- Russia, Ukraine leaders signal progress in talks on peace, gas