New U.S., Cuba talks on mail 'fruitful'
Published: Monday, Sept. 16, 2013, 9:27 p.m.
HAVANA — The United States and Cuba concluded on Monday their second round of talks aimed at re-establishing direct mail service between the two countries after a 50-year ban but left for later the most sensitive issue — Cuban planes landing on U.S. soil.
The Cuban Foreign Ministry said both sides had agreed to continue the talks in the near future and that it had emphasized “working out the transportation of mail by regular direct routes in both directions” was key to their successful conclusion.
Cuba said talks between the postal services of the two countries took place “in a respectful manner,” and the U.S. Interests Section said officials “described the discussions as fruitful.”
The U.S. delegation, led by Lea Emerson, postal service executive director for international postal services, was to tour Cuban mail facilities on Tuesday, the Interests Section said.
The countries do not have diplomatic relations but maintain lower-level missions in each other's capitals.
Direct mail service between the United States and Cuba has been suspended since 1963.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Russian President Putin claims he will pardon longtime foe
- Diplomat delivers stern warning to African nation
- Defense Secretary Hagel calls China’s actions ‘irresponsible’
- More than 75 injured after London theater’s ceiling partially collapses
- Israeli shot dead near border with Lebanon
- Christians sentenced for killing Muslim
- Pope Francis alarms some traditionalists
- Sen. McCain supports Ukraine protesters, irks Moscow
- Kerry pledges $17 million in aid to Vietnam’s Mekong Delta
- Wave of attacks kill 70 people in Iraq
- Fake signer at Mandela event accused in mob attack