Obama open to meeting new Iranian leader next week
The White House said on Thursday that President Obama may meet with his Iranian counterpart in New York next week but called for “action” rather than words from Hassan Rouhani, who has sent signals he's seeking a thaw in relations with the United States.
Obama and Rouhani will be in New York to attend the U.N. General Assembly, and speculation has grown that the two leaders might have a tete-a-tete.
White House spokesman Jay Carney acknowledged a change in tone between Iran and the West since Rouhani took office and said a meeting was possible, though not scheduled.
“It's possible, but it has always been possible,” he said. “The extended hand has been there from the moment the president was sworn into office.”
Western powers believe Iran is developing nuclear weapons. Tehran claims its program is peaceful.
Israel said that Rouhani's assurance that Tehran would not pursue nuclear weapons was false.
“One must not be fooled by the Iranian president's fraudulent words,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said.
Rouhani, who took office in August, said in a television interview that his country would never develop nuclear weapons and that he had “complete authority” to negotiate a nuclear deal with the United States and its allies.
In the second part of the interview with NBC News, which aired on Thursday, he criticized Israel.
Rouhani said Israel was “an occupier, a usurper government that does injustice to the people of the region.” The Iranian claimed it “has brought instability to the region with its war-mongering policies.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.