Lebanese army subs for Hezbollah at Beirut checkpoints
BEIRUT — Lebanese security forces replaced Hezbollah fighters on Monday at checkpoints in Beirut's southern suburbs in response to criticism that the group's recently enacted security measures proved it maintains its own mini-state in southern Lebanon.
Hezbollah set up dozens of checkpoints this summer to control access to an area known as Dahiya after a series of bombings and other incidents targeted the militant group's followers in apparent retaliation for its open support for the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
The checkpoints, however, served as a daily reminder that Shiite Muslim Hezbollah, which maintains tens of thousands of well-trained fighters, is Lebanon's most powerful political and military force, and they sparked repeated complaints from Sunni Muslim and Christian politicians that Hez-bollah once again had bypassed the Lebanese state.
Lebanon's caretaker interior minister, Marwan Charbel, urged residents to assist with the transition.
“The residents should support the security forces, and they should not doubt their competency and capabilities,” he said. “I urge the residents of Dahiya to cooperate with the security forces, who are deployed to ensure their safety.”
He shouldered the blame for Hezbollah's having to assign its own fighters to protect the neighborhood after a suicide blast last month killed dozens of people just a hundred yards from key Hezbollah facilities.
“The problem in Dahiya and the phenomenon of autonomous security emerged because of our shortcomings,” he said.
One resident said she viewed the development with a mixture of relief and concern, noting the army's reputation for being more low-key than the Hezbollah fighters.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Afghan forces may resume night raids
- Brits blame web services in soldier’s death
- Islamic State got up to $45M in ransom payments
- Abduction in Mexico to spur police, judicial system changes