Gunmen assault town in Iraq
BAGHDAD — Gunmen on Tuesday tried to take over a small Sunni town in Iraq's west, sparking battles that left 11 people — including six attackers — dead, a town official said.
The assault on Ana, about 200 miles northwest of Baghdad on the road to the Syrian border, comes amid a surge in attacks by Sunni militants building on rising sectarian tensions. The province, Anbar, has been an epicenter of protests by Sunnis against what they consider to be second-class treatment by the Shiite-led government.
Waqas Adnan, the mayor of Ana, said the assault on the town started at dawn when a car bomb exploded near the town's police station. The mayor said about 30 gunmen attacked and seized his house.
He added that his brother, as well as four policemen and six attackers died in the two hours of fighting that ensued.
Adnan, who was unharmed, said bombs were planted in his house by the insurgents, but they did not explode. Army reinforcements were sent to the town as a result of the clashes.
“The insurgents were trying to seize the city even for a few hours in order to show that al-Qaida is still powerful in our area,” Adnan said.
The violence came after a series of deadly attacks, mainly on Shiite and Sunni funerals, that left more than 130 people dead in the past three days.
Security forces and government officials are favorite targets for Sunni insurgents, as are Sunni anti-al-Qaida militias and others opposed to the hard-line group. More than 4,000 people have been killed over the past five months alone, according to U.N. figures.
In other violence, police said a car bomb exploded near a supermarket in Baghdad's neighborhood of Ghazaliyah, killing two people and wounding nine others.
A medic in a nearby hospital confirmed the casualty figure for the Baghdad attack. All officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.