Egypt closes offices of party publication
CAIRO — Egyptian security forces on Wednesday shuttered the office of the newspaper of the Muslim Brotherhood's political party and confiscated furniture and documents, journalists from the Freedom and Justice daily said.
In a statement Wednesday, the journalists appealed to Egypt's press syndicate to take action against the closure in Cairo, where the office is sealed.
The closure occurs two days after a court ordered the group outlawed and its assets seized. Egypt's interim government said on Tuesday that it would not ban the group until the ruling is upheld by a higher tribunal.
Islam Tawfiq, an editor with the Freedom and Justice daily and a member of the Brotherhood, said the newspaper will continue to be published, and its edition for Thursday is ready for print. He said the newspaper staff had evacuated the office in June, days before mass protests against Islamist President Mohamed Morsy, under threat of attack.
The staff has been working elsewhere, he said, and only furniture, electrical appliances, and some documents were confiscated from the office. An order to ban the publication was issued a day after Morsy was ousted on July 4, he said, amid a crackdown on pro-Brotherhood media. The Brotherhood's TV channel, Misr25, has been off the air since then and was later banned by a court order.
But the state-owned Al-Ahram printers continued to publish the paper, he said, on condition it reduce its pages by half and print circulation down to 10,000 from 100,000.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Israelis intercept protest ship at sea bound for Gaza Strip
- Car bomb blast kills Egypt’s top prosecutor Barakat
- Kuwait mosque bomber slipped security watch in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain
- Greeks rally as Prime Minister Tsipras rejects crisis bailout
- Suspected allies of beach gunman arrested in Tunisia
- Financial team to assess Puerto Rico’s woes
- Jewish population near pre-World War II level
- Oslo bees get flowery highway pollinators
- Allentown firm ups security at Western Pa. facilities after France attack
- Powder’s role in fire at Taiwan music festival investigated
- Effort under way to beat Tuesday deadline for nuclear agreement