Taliban claims responsibility for 'insider attack' on NATO-Afghan base that kills U.S. service member
By The Los Angeles Times
Published: Thursday, Sept. 26, 2013, 7:00 p.m.
KABUL, Afghanistan — A U.S. service member was killed on Thursday in Afghanistan's eastern Paktia province when a man in an Afghan National Army uniform opened fire on a joint military training base, provincial officials said.
The assailant was killed in return fire by North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces, said Rohullah Samoon, a spokesman for Paktia's governor.
“It's too early to say whether the Afghan soldier was a Taliban infiltrator,” Samoon said, adding that a joint investigation by Afghan and coalition forces was under way into the incident in Paktia's Gerda Seri district.
Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said in a Twitter message that his group was responsible for the attack. NATO confirmed the death but didn't immediately provide the victim's nationality, in keeping with its policy.
This was the second so-called insider attack in Paktia in less than a week. Three American troops were killed in a similar incident on Saturday.
Insider attacks killed 62 people in 47 incidents in 2012, according to NATO, compared with 35 killed in 21 attacks in 2011.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Police: Toronto mayor tried to buy crack tape
- Empty, $36M facility justified, general finds
- Hezbollah commander shot down
- ‘Dangerous’ radioactive material found in Mexico
- Egyptian satirist says show’s suspension wasn’t ‘nice’
- Egyptian panel likely to include women, Christians
- Robert Gumbita retains Mt. Pleasant School Board president seat
- North Korea leader apparently boots uncle from post
- Judge says Irish police colluded in killings by IRA
- Did Comet ISON survive?
- China scrambles jets to track U.S.