Indonesian judge arrested in alleged bribery
JAKARTA — The top judge on Indonesia's Constitutional Court has been arrested on suspicion of taking bribes in the country's latest high-profile graft scandal, an official said on Thursday.
Chief Justice Akil Mochtar is the third high-ranking official to be taken into custody by the Corruption Eradication Commission this year. The suspected graft that led to his arrest, along with five others, is believed to be connected to disputed results in a district chief election, said commission spokesman Johan Budi.
Mochtar and two other suspects were arrested at his house in the capital, Jakarta. They were caught “red-handed” and investigators seized $265,000 in cash, Budi said.
“The operation was based on information received some days earlier about a plan for the money delivery,” Budi told a news conference. “The two suspects were believed to have handed over the money to Mochtar when captured.”
One of those arrested with Mochtar was Chairun Nisa, a legislator from the Golkar Party. The judge had been a lawmaker from the same party before being appointed to the court in 2008 and becoming chief justice in April.
Another suspect, Hambit Bintih, the incumbent chief of Gunung Mas District in Central Kalimantan, was arrested at a Jakarta hotel, Budi said.
The district chief was re-elected Sept. 4, but two competitors filed a lawsuit with the Constitutional Court alleging that Bintih paid voters. Mochtar was a member of the three-judge panel handling the case.
Two other suspects were taken into custody later Thursday and $87,000 was seized in connection with another regional election.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.