Cancellation of Obama trip to Asia boost for China's Xi
BEIJING — Splashed across the front pages, there is Chinese President Xi Jinping, resplendent as he strolls with his photogenic first lady down the red carpet welcoming him in Malaysia.
All the while, President Obama — wings clipped by the impasse with Congress — finds himself grounded in Washington.
The optics couldn't be worse. The cancellation of the president's trip to Southeast Asia happens at a triumphant moment for Xi, who is basking in the attention that might otherwise be diverted to Obama.
The White House announced on Thursday that Obama would cancel a trip to Bali for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. Earlier in the week, the administration said that stops in the Philippines and Malaysia had been cut because of the government shutdown.
“It shows the decline of the United States,” said Shen Dingli, a professor of American studies at Shanghai's Fudan University.
The cancellation of the trip seems to belie earlier U.S. claims of making a “pivot” toward Asia in foreign policy.
“That's a joke,” said Shen. “If they can't pass a budget at home, how can they lead Asia and the world?”
Secretary of State John Kerry will represent America at the summit in Bali, but he lacks Obama's celebrity power, especially in Indonesia, where the president lived as a child.
That leaves Xi as the unchallenged star attraction at a forum where the United States and China have a pressing rivalry. Many Southeast Asian countries are looking to America as a counterweight to China's territorial ambitions in the South China Sea.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.