ShareThis Page

Raids show U.S. more aggressive against terrorists

| Monday, Oct. 7, 2013, 9:33 p.m.

NAIROBI, Kenya — U.S. interrogators headed to an American warship in the Mediterranean to question a suspected Libyan al-Qaida operative linked to the bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa as details emerged on Monday about plots planned by a Kenyan terrorist who escaped a U.S. raid in Somalia.

The two operations, thousands of miles apart in Africa and approved by President Obama, signaled an American readiness to go after terrorists in nations where authorities are unable to do so, even years later.

The suspect captured in Tripoli is under U.S. federal indictment but was being held in military custody aboard the USS San Antonio in international waters — detained under the laws of war as an enemy combatant.

A computer expert known as Abu Anas al-Libi, he is accused of using an early-generation Apple computer to assemble surveillance photographs in Nairobi in preparation for the deadly 1998 bombing of the Embassy, according to a former law enforcement official.

The surveillance information was presented to Osama bin Laden, who approved the bombing, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak about the case.

Meanwhile, a Kenyan intelligence report asserted the country had foiled attacks plotted by Abdulkadir Mohamed Abdulkadir, the Kenyan militant who eluded capture by a team of Navy SEALs in a pre-dawn raid on Saturday in Somalia. Also known as Ikrima, he was identified as the lead planner of a plot by the al-Qaida-linked al-Shabab militant group targeting Ken-ya's parliament building and the United Nations office in Nairobi in 2011 and 2012.

The report by Kenya's National Intelligence Service, which was leaked to The Associated Press and other media in the wake of the Sept. 21 terror attack on Nairobi's Westgate Mall that killed more than 60 people, lists Samantha Lewthwaite — a Briton dubbed the “White Widow” — as one of several “key actors” in the plot, which targeted Ken-yan military installations and top Ken-yan political and security officials.

Lewthwaite, who was married to one of the suicide bombers in the 2005 attack on London's transit system, escaped capture when she produced a fraudulently obtained South African passport in another person's name. Late last month, Interpol, acting on a request from Kenya, issued an arrest warrant for Lewthwaite.

The report makes no mention of Abdulkadir in relation to the Nairobi mall attack, although in an entry dated exactly one year before the start of the four-day siege, it said al-Shabab operatives in Nairobi were planning to mount “suicide attacks on an undisclosed date, targeting Westgate Mall and Holy Family Basilica.”

Frank Cilluffo, director of George Washington University's Homeland Security Policy Institute, said the Navy SEALs operation in Somalia underscores the threat posed by the convergence of insurgent groups, particularly al-Shabab and the Yemen-based al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula.

While Ikrima may not be a household name, he said, “you have someone who is truly a go-between between al-Shabab, AQAP and probably al-Qaida central.”

“What you're seeing is some of the pooling of these various entities and between various organizations,” Cilluffo said. “And you are starting to see convergence of individual actors and of even planning and operations.”

Cilluffo said the raid suggests that the United States is going after top-level terrorists who are targeting foreign and Western interests, rather than those focused on internal Somalia attacks.

Obama approved both operations independently, White House spokesman Jay Carney said on Monday, saying it was “a coincidence” they happened at the same time.

As of Monday, the captured Libyan, al-Libi, had not been read his rights to remain silent and speak with an attorney.

It is unclear when he will be brought to the United States to face charges. The Obama administration has said it can hold high-value detainees on a ship for as long as necessary. In 2010, a judge ruled the government could prosecute a terror suspect in New York, despite holding him for five years in CIA and military custody, because the government has the authority to do this during wartime.

Al-Libi was indicted in Manhattan federal court in 2000, accused of carrying out “visual and photographic surveillance” of the Embassy in Nairobi before it was bombed in 1998.

He participated in possible planning of attacks on British, French and Israeli targets in Nairobi, according to the charges.

Former U.S. intelligence officials and military files indicate al-Libi traveled in jihadist circles for decades, using his skills as a savvy computer expert for al-Qaida.

After the 9/11 attacks in 2001, he fled with other al-Qaida operatives to Iran. After several years, he managed to leave the country under murky circumstances and make his way to the lawless areas of northwest Pakistan, where al-Qaida once flourished.

He went to Libya prior to the fall of Moammar Gadhafi's government and was reunited with his family, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive case.

Al-Libi, the former officials said, had been involved in battling Gadhafi's forces. The CIA and FBI continued to track his movements, waiting for the opportunity to pounce.

Once the Gadhafi regime fell in 2011, the U.S. intelligence community began focusing on trying to capture al-Libi. The Army's Delta Force worked with local Libyans to apprehend him.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.