Egypt's al-Sisi doesn't rule out election run
CAIRO — Egypt's powerful army chief left open the possibility of running for president in elections scheduled next year, according to excerpts of an interview published on Tuesday, as he gave his first account of his overthrow of the country's Islamist president.
Since the July 3 coup that removed President Mohamed Morsy, there have been growing calls from the military's supporters for Gen. Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi to run to replace him. Previously, a military spokesman denied al-Sisi had political ambitions. The interview with the newspaper Al-Masry al-Youm was the general's first direct comment on the issue.
“I think the time is inappropriate to raise this question in light of the challenges and risks that the country is going through,” he said when asked whether he would run, according to excerpts of the interview that were posted on the newspaper's website.
He said attention must not be distracted from carrying out “the map for the future” for a post-Morsy transition, “which will create a new reality that is hard to evaluate now.”
Then he was silent and added, “God gets His way,” according to the excerpts.
Al-Sisi, the defense minister and head of the military, removed Morsy after a wave of protests against the Islamist leader demanding his ouster and accusing his Muslim Brotherhood of seeking to dominate Egypt. Al-Sisi said in the interview that he repeatedly urged Morsy to compromise with his opponents and be more inclusive.
Since then, the military-backed interim government has cracked down on the group, accusing top leaders of incitement and murder, rounding up about 2,000 members and killing hundreds of pro-Morsy demonstrators.
There has been an escalation of violence by Islamic militants — many from groups allied to the Brotherhood.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.