Iran told it won't be all talk on nukes
GENEVA — World powers will press Iran on Wednesday for details of its proposal on resolving the decade-old nuclear dispute.
Western diplomats stress they want Iran to back up its newly conciliatory language with concrete actions. They say Iran must scale back its nuclear program, allaying suspicions that it is seeking the capability to make atomic bombs.
Both sides are trying to dampen expectations of any rapid breakthrough at the two-day meeting in Geneva — the first to be held since President Hassan Rouhani took office. He has promised conciliation over confrontation in Iran's relations with the world.
“There is still an awful lot of work to be done,” said a spokesman for the European Union's foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who oversees diplomacy with Iran on behalf of the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany.
“We have had a certain amount of information from the Iranian side, and we will hope to get more detail from them tomorrow,” spokesman Michael Mann.
His statement suggested that Iran must convince Western nations that it is willing to curb the nuclear work and assure them that nuclear production is purely for peaceful energy production and medical purposes, as Tehran says.
Negotiators started discussing the “nitty-gritty” details of Iran's suggestions, Mann said.
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said his side has presented a proposal capable of achieving a breakthrough. But he later added it isn't possible to tell whether progress is being made.
“It's too soon to judge,” he said.
Rouhani's election in June raised hopes in the West that Iran finally is ready to strike a deal. Iran is anxious to win relief from Western-led sanctions, which have crippled its economy; cut its oil export revenues 60 percent; and brought about a devaluation of its rial currency.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.