Family of Nazi searches for body
ROME — The case of Nazi war criminal Erich Priebke took another bizarre twist on Thursday, as his family said it doesn't know where his body is.
Family lawyer Paolo Giachini said he and the former SS captain's family lost track of Priebke's casket on Tuesday night, when they tried to celebrate a funeral Mass for him in a church compound in Albano Laziale south of Rome.
At a certain point, he told Sky TG24, a group of about 30 people entered the compound and took the casket out amid protests pitting Priebke's right-wing supporters against his detractors.
Italian state radio said the casket was taken to a nearby military base. But Giachini said he has not been able to establish who has the body or where it is, and Italian officials have refused to divulge information about it.
“It's unheard of that a casket can be made to disappear in this country, taken from those who had custody of it in a private place — a place of worship — and taking it by force without any order, any notification,” Giachini said. “We want clarity.”
Priebke died on Friday at age 100 in Rome, where he was serving a life term for the 1944 massacre of 335 civilians at the Ardeatine Caves outside Rome. It was one of the worst atrocities in German-occupied Italy during World War II.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hong Kong protest leader Wong an unlikely icon
- Dozens killed in bombing attack on Nigerian mosque
- Russian doctors rebel over health reform
- After 2,000 years, China finally will end state monopoly on salt
- U.S. military shifts strategy to smaller Iraq force
- Ukraine aims to ride reform to European Union
- Lack of money may crush ISIS
- Egypt’s fixation on dictator Mubarak trial wanes
- OPEC to maintain crude oil output target
- Zambia’s interim president sub-Saharan Africa’s only white leader
- 2 Israelis die in separate knife attacks by Palestinians