Share This Page

Violin from Titanic sets 'world record'

| Saturday, Oct. 19, 2013, 6:15 p.m.
AFP/Getty Images
(FILES) - A picture dated September 16, 2013 shows the violin played by bandmaster Wallace Hartley during the final moments before the sinking of the Titanic at a conservation studio in Lurgan, Northern Ireland. The violin is expected to attract huge attention and fetch a world record fee when it goes on auction on October 19, 2013. AFP PHOTO/ PETER MUHLYPETER MUHLY/AFP/Getty Images

LONDON — A violin believed to have been played on the Titanic before the doomed vessel sank was auctioned on Saturday for more than $1.6 million, a figure that one collector said may never be beaten.

The sea-corroded instrument, now unplayable, probably belonged to Wallace Hartley, whose band stoically continued playing on the ship's deck until the disaster's final hour. More than 1,500 perished in the 1912 disaster. The last music they played was “Nearer My God to Thee.”

“It's a world record for a Titanic artifact,” said Peter Boyd-Smith, a Titanic memorabilia collector at the auction, hosted by Henry Aldridge and Son in the town of Devizes.

“The only other items that are probably worth that kind of money are the items salvaged from RMS Titanic if they are ever put up for sale and those are in the exhibitions that go around America and Europe.

“It may never get beaten.”

The violin, with Hartley's name on it, is believed to have been found at sea with the musician's body more than a week after the Titanic sank.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.