NSA hacked email of Mexico's president, leaked files reveal
WASHINGTON — Der Spiegel reported on Sunday that the National Security Agency has been systematically eavesdropping on the Mexican government for years. The U.S. agency hacked into the president's public email account and gained deep insight into policymaking and the political system, the German newspaper said, citing documents leaked by former U.S. contractor Edward Snowden.
Mexico's government condemned the alleged hacking of the email account of then-President Felipe Calderon in 2010.
“In a relationship between neighbors and partners, there's no room for the practices that allegedly took place,” the foreign ministry said, reiterating its call for President Obama's administration to conduct an investigation of NSA conduct.
In an operation called “Flatliquid,” the NSA used a server to gain access to Calderon's account and the Mexican presidential domain used by cabinet members for diplomatic and economic communications.
The United States gathers foreign intelligence of the type gathered by all nations, the NSA said in a statement, declining to comment on the Der Spiegel report.
In another, previously unknown operation reported by the German paper, the agency gained access in 2009 to emails of high-ranking officials in Mexico's bureau that combats drug and human trafficking.
This hacking operation let the NSA not only obtain information on several drug cartels, but also gain access to “diplomatic talking-points.” In a single year, this operation produced 260 classified reports that allowed Americans to conduct successful talks on political issues and plan investments.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.