Drone use a war crime, human rights groups claim
Published: Tuesday, Oct. 22, 2013, 8:09 p.m.
WASHINGTON — Human rights groups on Tuesday accused the United States of breaking international law and perhaps committing war crimes by killing civilians in missile and drone strikes that were intended to hit militants in Pakistan and Yemen.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch released separate reports detailing the deaths of dozens of civilians in the two countries. They urged the Obama administration and Congress to investigate, and end a policy of secrecy on the attacks.
“In some of the cases we looked at ... they appear to be war crimes, but really the full picture is for the U.S. authorities to reveal,” Mustafa Qadri, Pakistan researcher at Amnesty International, said when describing the death of a 68-year-old Pakistani grandmother in an alleged drone strike.
“We are saying for the U.S. authorities to come clean,” he said at a joint news conference with Human Rights Watch.
Responding to the reports, White House spokesman Jay Carney said Obama administration officials “take the matter of civilian casualties enormously seriously.” He said he could not speak to specific operations, but that policies met international and domestic legal obligations, and the standard of “near certainty” that civilians would not be hit.
Officials have argued that any drone strikes are very carefully targeted and that civilian casualties have been kept to a bare minimum, possibly in the low dozens.
Letta Tayler of Human Rights Watch said her organization had found violations of international law when civilians were “indiscriminately” killed in Yemen.
In a Sept. 2, 2012, attack, the target — an alleged al Qaeda militant, Abd al-Raouf al-Dahab, — was “nowhere in sight” when the United States hit a passenger van and killed 12 people returning from the market, she said.
“Their loved ones found their charred bodies in pieces on the roadside, dusted in flour and sugar that they were bringing home to their families,” Tayler said.
Both the Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch reports looked at a handful of U.S. attacks in Pakistan and Yemen to urge transparency and accountability in policy.
U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen increased dramatically after President Obama took office in 2009, and the pilotless aerial vehicles became a key part of the fight against al-Qaida. More recently, the number of strikes has slowed.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Expert witness for Pistorius blistered again
- Putin’s national address to Russians raises fears of possible incursion into southeastern Ukraine
- Afghan officials say detainment of Taliban commander thwarts peace process
- Seabed data analyzed; oil discounted
- U.S. to release $450M for Iran
- Chaos prevailed on bridge as South Korean ferry listed, crewman says