Kerry urges Syrian rebels to negotiate
LONDON — Secretary of State John Kerry said on Tuesday that the leaders of Syria's moderate opposition are weighing whether to join a peace conference next month in Geneva, even as he added his voice to a chorus of 10 other nations calling for a renewed commitment to negotiations to end Syria's bloody civil war.
“This war will not come to an end on the battlefield,” Kerry said at a news conference in London after talks on the crisis. “It will come to an end through a negotiated settlement.”
Kerry met with foreign ministers from the “London 11” — a core group from the Friends of Syria group consisting of Britain, Egypt, France, Germany, Italy, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and the United States — and with senior Syrian opposition leaders.
The London meeting was intended to lay the groundwork for the peace talks in the Swiss city, with the goal of the opposing sides in Syria — representatives of President Bashar al-Assad's government and the rebels — coming together to establish a transitional governing body.
However, it was unclear during the talks whether the Syrian Opposition Coalition, the main Western-backed opposition group, would attend talks in Geneva as a united front.
The Syrian National Council, a prominent group with representatives in the Syrian Opposition Coalition, has said it would boycott the Geneva meeting, declaring it would not deal with representatives of Assad's government.
Even so, Kerry said he thought it could happen.
“I believe that the conference can happen next month. I'm hoping it will happen next month,” he said. “Obviously, there are other players. . . . They are independent, and they have to exercise their own rights here.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.