Blast reported near U.S. Embassy in Yemen
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, Oct. 28, 2013, 9:09 p.m.
ADEN, Yemen — Yemeni security officials said an explosion followed by what sounded like heavy gunfire was heard late Monday near the U.S. Embassy in the capital, Sanaa, but government spokesmen later said the sound was fireworks from a wedding procession.
The State Department issued a statement saying it had no indication that reports of an attack on or near the embassy were accurate.
The reports were made amid what appeared to be a security alert in the capital, where the local branch of al-Qaida periodically stages high-profile attacks. Extra security troops could be seen deployed since Sunday, and motorcycles were absent from main streets. They were banned during past alerts to prevent them from being used to carry bombs.
Two security officials in Yemen said by phone that the blast occurred near the embassy, followed by the sounds of gunfire. One said troops sealed off the area. They spoke anonymously as they were not authorized to talk to media.
But Mohammed al-Mawri, an official at the Yemeni Interior Minister's office, said the blast was fireworks from a wedding procession. A Yemeni Embassy spokesman in Washington, Mohammed Albasha, gave the same account.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pistorius’ ex-girlfriend tells court at his murder trial of guns, temper
- In North Korea, voting’s really a breeze: You must vote and you get 1 candidate
- Saudis name terrorist groups
- Dutch pot problems spill into its streets
- Poland pursues probe into alleged CIA prison
- Chinese news calls U.S. envoy slur
- United Nations says 703 killed in Iraq in February attacks
- Sedition charges possible for Kashmir fans of Pakistani cricket team
- Crimean vote called illegal