China probes terror links in crash
BEIJING — Chinese authorities asked local hotels to watch for a pair of suspects from a majority-Muslim western region of the country as suspicions grew that a deadly car crash and fire near Tiananmen Square was a terror attack.
The vehicle plowed through dozens of pedestrians and police at the center of the capital at lunchtime Monday, killing five people and injuring 38 people, Qianlong.com, a Beijing government news website, reported. Killed were the driver, two passengers, a female tourist from the Philippines and a male tourist from Guangdong province in South China.
Beijing police in a notice to area hotels named two suspects from Xinjiang region in China's northwest, the Global Times, a Communist Party-run newspaper, reported. Staff at the French-owned IBIS Beijing hotel, in central Jianguomen, confirmed they had received the notice.
Chinese authorities have not said publicly whether the attack was terrorism, and Beijing police declined to comment on Tuesday.
Ethnic unrest has plagued the region as China's majority Han people have immigrated to the area and clashed with the native Uighur people. The Uighur, who are Muslim, have long complained about repressive rule by Beijing. The Chinese government argues it has brought badly-needed development, and says violent incidents there are fomented by “hostile foreign forces.”
Police named Yusupu Aihemaiti, 25, of Pishan County and Yusupu Wumaierniyazi, 43, from Shanshan County, where Chinese authorities said rioters killed 22 civilians and two policemen in June. The notice told hotel management to watch out for “suspicious” people and vehicles dating to Oct. 1, and gave four license number plates from Xinjiang.
Beijing police confirmed to the Global Times that they had issued the notice to hotels, but did not comment further.
An investigation is underway, Xinhua, the state news agency, reported.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pope: Priests in Holy Year can absolve ‘sin of abortion’
- Officer killed in Ukraine clash with nationalist protesters
- 5 killed in western India as demonstrators riot
- Beirut protests grow as summer garbage crisis lingers
- Egypt, sans parliament for more than 3 years, sets elections
- European Union struggles for answers as migrant influx raises tensions