Seemingly miffed with U.S., Egypt courts Russians
By The Washington Post
Published: Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013, 6:39 p.m.
CAIRO — Egypt edged further away from its traditional place within the U.S. sphere of influence on Thursday, hosting Russia's foreign and defense ministers in the highest-level talks between the two countries in years.
The visit, which included discussions on strengthening military ties and diplomatic efforts on Syria, challenged the U.S. position as Egypt's primary benefactor and was seen as a diplomatic swipe at Egypt's increasingly estranged Western ally.
Russia, a stalwart supporter of embattled Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, has stepped up its role in the Middle East in recent months, taking action where Washington has been reluctant to engage and brokering the deal to destroy Syria's chemical weapons stockpiles.
Expanding ties with Egypt, the Arab world's most populous country, would give Russia an even firmer foothold in countries that once relied mainly on their alliances with the United States.
“We are not replacing one party with another,” said Badr Abdelatty, an Egyptian Foreign Ministry spokesman. “We want to strengthen the independence of our foreign policy. We want to diversify. And Russia is a very important global power.”
Sergei Shoigu's visit to Cairo was the first by a Russian defense minister since the 1970s, when then-President Anwar Sadat ejected thousands of Soviet military advisers in an effort to curry favor with the West.
Egypt's commanding general, Abdel Fatah al-Sissi, said Shoigu's presence would help launch “a new era of constructive, fruitful cooperation on the military level.”
In addition, the arrival of two Russian warships at Egyptian ports in the Mediterranean and the Red Sea in the past week marked the first joint naval maneuvers between the two countries in years.
U.S.-Egyptian relations have been tense since July, when Egypt's military ousted Mohamed Morsy from the presidency in a popularly backed coup.
A subsequent crackdown on Morsy's supporters, including the violent dispersal of a mass sit-in in Cairo that killed hundreds, prompted the Obama administration to halt about a third of its $1.3 billion in annual military aid to Egypt. The United States also withheld delivery of F-16 fighter jets, M1A1 Abrams tank kits and Harpoon missiles.
A flurry of recent media reports in Egypt and Russia suggested that the two countries were negotiating a multibillion-dollar weapons deal, which would demonstrate Egypt's ability to procure advanced weapons systems without U.S. help.
Although no deal was announced on Thursday, Abdelatty, the Foreign Ministry spokesman, said: “Of course Egypt will be cooperating militarily with Russia.”
Michael Stephens, deputy director of the Royal United Services Institute, a defense industry think tank in Qatar, called the talk of an arms deal “a bit of saber rattling.”
“But it doesn't mean it won't happen,” Stephens said. “If the Americans don't respond positively to this, then we'll see some problems. Then we'll see some pushing forward for the deal.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- 100 schoolgirls kidnapped in Nigeria; militants blamed
- U.N. Security Council views purported photos of Syrian war dead
- Iran blasts ambassador visa denial
- Ukraine bares teeth as troops repel rebels
- Pistorius testimony elicits laughter from prosecutor, warning from judge
- Journalists: Egypt trial a joke
- Former Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi to serve time helping seniors
- $36M ‘chicken cup’ cracks auction record for Chinese art
- Crossbow attacks on dogs sweep through Managua, Nicaragua
- Iran president ends monthly cash payment to 90 percent of citizens
- North Korean embassy officials in London pay visit to salon owner