10th day of air raids deadly in Syrian city
BEIRUT — Syria's latest round of government air raids on rebel-held areas of the northern city of Aleppo killed at least 15 people on Tuesday, including three children, activists said.
The strikes extended the furious aerial assault by President Bashar Assad's warplanes and helicopters on the embattled city into its 10th day. Activists say more than 360 people were killed in the first nine days of the campaign, which began Dec. 15.
The latest airstrikes hit the rebel-held Sukkari neighborhood of Aleppo, said the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. At least 15 were killed.
Another activist group, the Aleppo Media Center, said at least 33 people were killed and 150 were wounded.
Disparate death tolls are common in the chaotic aftermath of such attacks.
The Aleppo Media Center said the strikes were carried out by jets and helicopters, and hit at least three sites — causing extensive damage; toppling apartment buildings; and setting houses and vehicles ablaze.
The soaring death toll and extensive damage caused by the aerial campaign prompted the United States and Britain on Monday to condemn the assault on Aleppo.
The main Western-backed Syrian opposition group, the Syrian National Coalition, threatened on Monday that if the bombing campaign against Aleppo continues,the group won't participate in U.N.-sponsored peace talks planned for Jan. 22 in Switzerland.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.