Share This Page

African leaders pursue peace talks in South Sudan

| Thursday, Dec. 26, 2013, 9:09 p.m.

JUBA, South Sudan — African leaders tried on Thursday to advance peace talks between South Sudan's president and political rivals, whom he accuses of attempting a coup to topple the government of the world's newest country.

As fighting persisted in parts of South Sudan's oil-producing region, Kenya's President Uhuru Kenyatta and Ethiopia's Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn had “a constructive dialogue” with South Sudan's President Salva Kiir, according to Kiir's foreign minister.

Former Vice President Riek Machar, who leads renegade troops, was not represented at the talks. No political breakthrough emerged.

The next round of meetings will be in Kenya's capital of Nairobi, where regional leaders under a bloc known as IGAD will meet on Friday to discuss a report from the meeting, said South Sudan's Foreign Minister Barnaba Marial Benjamin.

Kiir agreed “in principle” to stop hostilities and to negotiate with who is expected to be invited formally by IGAD to attend upcoming peace talks, Benjamin said.

Government troops are trying to retake control of Bentiu, the capital of Unity state, from forces loyal to Machar.

Fighting was reported in Malakal, capital of Upper Nile state. Upper Nile and Unity comprise the country's key oil-producing region, raising concerns that unrest there could cut off the economic lifeblood of the nation, which gets nearly its entire government budget from oil.

Citing more progress against rebels on the battlefield, South Sudan's minister of information said that national forces on Thursday regained “full control” of Malakal. Michael Makuei Lueth said “criminal elements” have been looting the town, but the army has it under control.

Military spokesman Col. Philip Aguer said government troops are “preparing to retake Bentiu as soon as possible.”

The government said its forces retook Bor, the capital of Jonglei state, earlier this week. But Hilde Johnson, head of the U.N. mission in South Sudan, said fighting continues in the city.

The fighting has stoked fears of a civil war in the country that peacefully broke away from Sudan in 2011.

“The nation painstakingly built over decades of conflict and strife is at stake,” Johnson told reporters at U.N. headquarters in New York by videoconference from Juba. “I therefore call on the political leaders of South Sudan to order their forces to lay down their arms and to give peace a chance, and to do so urgently.”

The United States, Norway and Ethiopia are leading efforts to open peace talks between Kiir and his political rivals. Kiir said in a Christmas address that he is willing to “dialogue” with all his opponents.

The United Nations is investigating reports of mass killings since violence began spreading after a Dec. 15 fight among the presidential guards that pitted soldiers from Kiir's Dinka ethnic group against those from the Nuer ethnic group of Machar.

“It's very important to underline this is a political struggle,” Johnson said, stressing that there is “multi-ethnic representation on both sides.”

The United Nations estimates “well over a thousand killed” in the 11 days of fighting, Johnson said.

Although the capital, Juba, is now calm, fighting appears to be expanding, stretching the limits of humanitarian workers and aid agencies. The U.N. humanitarian office said aid agencies need $166 million to save lives amid the continuing violence.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.