Kerry gets back to Mideast negotiations
By Bloomberg News
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 1, 2014, 8:33 p.m.
JERUSALEM — Secretary of State John Kerry returned to the Middle East on Thursday, aiming to get Israelis and Palestinians to agree on the contours of a final peace accord to establish momentum for their troubled negotiations.
The framework agreement Kerry seeks would establish broad outlines for resolving issues at the heart of the conflict, such as the final borders of Jewish and Palestinian states, conflicting claims to Jerusalem and the fate of Palestinian refugees, while reserving details of implementation for a final treaty, a senior State Department official said. The official spoke to reporters this week on condition of anonymity because peace efforts are confidential.
Kerry won't present Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas with a U.S. plan that would be imposed on the parties, the official said. Instead, he will offer proposals to bridge gaps that emerged during about 20 Israeli-Palestinian negotiating sessions and see whether these ideas will allow the formulation of a blueprint for a final deal, the official said. Kerry will be shuttling between Abbas and Netanyahu during his visit.
“The problem with a framework agreement is that in order to reach a deal on it now, it has to be vague enough so both sides can live with it,” said Yehuda Ben Meir, a former Israeli deputy foreign minister and a senior research fellow at Tel Aviv's Institute of National Security Studies. “But if Kerry is serious about achieving something more substantial than a photo op, he has to demand from both sides an agreement that isn't so vague it's virtually meaningless.”
The U.S.-brokered-negotiations, begun in late July and set to run nine months, have been strained in recent weeks by escalating Palestinian violence and moves to cement Israel's presence in the West Bank. Palestinians see the West Bank as the heart of a future state that would include east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip. Israel captured all three areas in 1967 and withdrew from Gaza in 2005.
Kerry has asked the sides not to discuss the substance of the talks, and they have largely complied. One disagreement that has emerged publicly regards future security arrangements in West Bank portions of the Jordan Valley.
Netanyahu has said Israel must maintain a security presence in the territory even after it is handed over to the Palestinians, to safeguard the Jewish state's eastern frontier. Palestinian officials say an Israeli military presence there would violate the sovereignty of the state they want to found.
The U.S. official said that while the Americans haven't given up hope of reaching a final deal by late April, a framework accord would offer for the first time a shared vision of peace after 20 years of on-again, off-again talks. No breakthrough is expected on this trip, and no deadline for reaching a framework agreement will be set, the official said. An agreed framework may not be made public, the official added.
Kerry arrives just days after Israel freed a third group of Palestinian prisoners, most convicted of fatal attacks on Israelis, under a commitment it made before the talks began. Netanyahu criticized the Palestinian Authority for celebrating the prisoners' return, saying “murderers are not heroes” and “this is not how one educates for peace.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Crimean vote called illegal
- Vatican skewers U.N. report on sex abuse
- Francis centralizes Vatican’s finances
- Benedict says rumors he was pressured to resign ‘absurd’
- Iran likely to dominate talks on sidelines of AIPAC forum
- South African athlete Pistorius’ murder trial reflects O.J. Simpson case
- North Korea to deport Christian missionary
- Pistorius trial: Witness heard screams then shots
- ‘Chavistas’ mark year since leader’s death
- Crimea lawmakers schedule vote on joining Russia
- Sedition charges possible for Kashmir fans of Pakistani cricket team