Share This Page

Gunfire erupts in South Sudan

| Sunday, Jan. 5, 2014, 8:54 p.m.

JUBA, South Sudan — Gunshots rang out in South Sudan's capital, Juba, for about an hour on Sunday as peace talks between rebels and the government to hammer out a cease-fire deal faced further delay in neighboring Ethiopia.

The gunfire came from the direction of the military headquarters of the SPLA government forces, toward the northern outskirts of the city. It was not clear who was involved.

Three weeks of fighting, which began in Juba but spread beyond, often along ethnic faultlines, have killed more than a thousand people, forced a cut in oil output and left the new state on the brink of civil war.

Juba has been largely calm since early clashes, though there was a brief gunbattle on Saturday evening and residents talk of tensions.

“I saw a truck full of soldiers going along the Bilpam road. They were singing. About 20 minutes later, the shooting started, and people started running towards town,” said Animu Afekuru, a local resident.

Western and regional powers, many of which supported negotiations that led to South Sudan's secession from Sudan in 2011, are pressing for a peace deal, fearing the fighting could destabilize east Africa.

The unrest pits President Salva Kiir's SPLA government forces against rebels loyal to former Vice President Riek Machar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.