Iran nuclear deal takes leap forward
By The Washington Post
Published: Sunday, Jan. 12, 2014, 9:48 p.m.
Iran and six world powers took a significant and hard-won step toward nuclear rapprochement on Sunday, announcing a deal to implement a landmark agreement that caps Iran's disputed nuclear program in return for a modest easing of crippling economic sanctions.
The announcement follows up on the breakthrough agreement reached in Geneva late last year after a decade of rising animosity and suspicion between Iran and much of the rest of the world over the country's advanced nuclear development. The six-month agreement halts the most worrisome nuclear work and rolls back some of Iran's sophisticated advances, but it stops far short of ensuring that the country could never develop a weapon.
The weeks of bargaining to put the November agreement in force was more difficult than anticipated, with one brief walkout by Iranian envoys and rancor among the bloc of nations that negotiated the deal. Russia and China, long Iran's protectors at the United Nations, pushed the United States to accept technical concessions that further make clear that Iran will retain the ability to enrich uranium, a key Iranian demand, once a final set of restrictions on its program is approved.
The Obama administration has preferred to blur that point in public, while arguing in private that the enrichment will be a face-saving token that does not pose a threat.
President Obama welcomed the technical agreement, which will take effect on Jan. 20, but he said a full, permanent deal will require hard bargaining. That negotiation will happen even as the Obama administration appears likely to lose a fight to stop Congress from approving additional economic penalties on Iran.
The White House continues to argue that the imposition of further sanctions could ruin what might be the world's best chance to resolve the Iranian nuclear problem.
“Unprecedented sanctions and tough diplomacy helped to bring Iran to the negotiating table,” Obama said in a statement. “Imposing additional sanctions now will only risk derailing our efforts.”
The president stressed that he would veto any legislation enacting sanctions.
Congressional backers of additional sanctions argue that the threat of such measures would strengthen Obama's hand in the difficult talks ahead. Republicans, in particular, accuse the White House of being cowed by what may be an Iranian bluff to walk away if sanctions are approved. The White House, however, argues that although sanctions forced Iran to the table, the strategy has run its course.
Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., scoffed at that rationale.
“Beginning Jan. 20, the administration will give the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism billions of dollars while allowing the mullahs to keep their illicit nuclear infrastructure in place,” Kirk said in a statement. “I am worried the administration's policies will either lead to Iranian nuclear weapons or Israeli air strikes.”
Sen. Bob Casey Jr., D-Scranton, called the news “encouraging” but said there is reason to be cautious.
“Tough sanctions got us to this point, and we must be mindful that the Iranian regime has negotiated in bad faith before and continues to be the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism,” he said in a statement. “While Iran's concessions under this interim agreement fall well short of what the international community should demand in a final deal, any curbs on the regime's pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability are better than none.”
Israel, which considers Iran a mortal enemy, has warned that it will blow up Iranian nuclear development sites if diplomacy fails to blunt the threat of attack by Iran on the nearby Jewish state.
The European Union's foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, said that the next step in the process is verification of the agreement by the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency.
“The foundations for a coherent, robust and smooth implementation of the joint plan of action over the six-month period have been laid,” said Ashton, who led the negotiations for the bloc comprising the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China — plus Germany.
The six-member bloc had negotiated on and off with Iran for years, but there had been no visible sign of progress until the election last year of reform-minded Hassan Rouhani as the country's president.
Rouhani's election is widely viewed as a recognition by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that the crushing sanctions and diplomatic isolation imposed on Iran over its nuclear program were not worth the cost.
Khamenei, who is likely to make the final decision about developing any nuclear weapon, has given Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif greater license than many in the West had expected in reaching a deal. That includes a concession by Iran to stop enriching uranium to 20 percent potency, a level considered within striking distance of bomb-quality fuel. The stockpile of 20 percent fuel would be degraded over the six-month period of talks.
Iran to get billions
Iran will get about $4.2 billion in relief from the release of previously frozen oil revenue in that period. It will receive the first installment — $550 million — on Feb. 1, a senior American official said on the condition of anonymity because the arrangement was discussed privately. International sanctions will be paused but not revoked, which the United States, Britain and other partners say allows for a quick tightening of the economic noose if Iran balks. Skeptics in Congress and elsewhere say that once loosened, the oil sanctions will be impossible to revive.
Zarif has said that if new sanctions are passed, “the entire deal is dead.”
Iran's senior nuclear negotiator, Abbas Araghchi, stressed what he called a balanced, equal outcome. He added in an interview with Iran's state news channel that the Islamic republic would continue enriching uranium to the 20 percent threshold until the last possible moment before Jan. 20. Talks on the final deal would begin two or three weeks later, he said, adding that the interim agreement imposes “no limitation on Iran to continue researching.”
That was a reference to Iran's demand that it continue research toward an advanced centrifuge for enriching uranium. Iran claims the machine would be used to produce fuel for power plants or medical reactors.
The development effort, however, became a sticking point in talks to ratify the interim deal because the work suggests an ongoing Iranian interest in bettering its nuclear capability beyond a level necessary for peaceful uses. Russia and China backed the Iranian position, leaving the United States somewhat isolated.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Autopsy details sicken Pistorius
- Israelis kill Jordanian judge at border checkpoint
- Van der Sloot to be extradited to U.S. in 2038
- Jailed Egyptian activists allege abuse by prison guards
- Western Pennsylvania engineer aboard missing Malaysia Airlines flight
- Eastern European military officers say security, economic ties blunt Russia’s war threat in Ukraine
- Pistorius trial: Witness heard screams then shots
- Ukrainian leader will meet Obama in U.S.
- Ukrainian leader will meet Obama in U.S.
- Investigators chase ‘every angle’ in missing Malaysian jet
- Syrian rebels reportedly release nuns held since December