Musician makes stand for politically charged song
BEIJING — A legendary Chinese rocker has refused to perform at a state broadcaster's variety show since being denied permission to sing a song that became an unofficial anthem of the 1989 pro-democracy protests, his manager said.
Cui Jian had proposed to sing his 1986 song “Nothing to My Name” at China Central Television's Jan. 30 gala show marking the Lunar New Year, but the event's censors told him that he would have to choose another, his manager, You You, said late Friday.
Cui decided to quit the show rather than sing a different song, You You said.
Cui sang “Nothing to My Name” at Tiananmen Square for students on a hunger strike in 1989, days before the government sent in tanks and troops to crack down on the demonstrations.
Later, Communist authorities denied him permission for concerts and censored his lyrics. In 2005, he was allowed to headline at a Beijing stadium, and the following year he performed with the Rolling Stones in Shanghai, singing “Wild Horses” alongside Mick Jagger.
Many members of the Chinese public praised Cui, 52, for refusing to kowtow to China's censors.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Early Mona Lisa’ painting traced to English noble
- Pakistan fervent about anti-blasphemy law
- Police end Sydney hostage siege after 16 hours
- Korean-American aid worker charged in China
- Russia seeks 10 years in prison for Putin foe Navalny
- Nigeria’s Islamic terrorist Boko Haram group poses threat to Cameroon