River dolphin species emerges in Brazil rainforest
SAO PAULO — Scientists have made the first discovery in 100 years of a new river dolphin species in the waters of the Araguaia river in Brazil's vast Amazon rainforest.
The discovery of the “Inia araguaiaensis” was officially announced in a study posted online by the Plos One scientific journal.
The study's lead author, biologist Tomas Hrbek of the Federal University of Amazonas in the city of Manaus, said the new species is the third ever found in the Amazon region.
“It was an unexpected discovery that shows just how incipient our knowledge is of the region's biodiversity,” Hrbek said by telephone.
“River dolphins are among the rarest and most endangered of all vertebrates, so discovering a new species is something that is very rare and exciting.”
He said that “people always saw them in the river, but no one ever took a close-up look at them.”
Hrbek added that scientists concluded the large dolphin was a new species by analyzing and comparing DNA samples of several types of dolphins from the Amazon and Araguaia river basins.
“The Araguaia dolphin is very similar to its Amazon river cousin although somewhat smaller and with fewer teeth,” he said.
There are about 1,000 “Inia araguaiaensis” dolphins living in the 1,630-mile-long river.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Islamic State got up to $45M in ransom payments
- Afghan forces may resume night raids
- Brits blame web services in soldier’s death
- Teen girls’ suicide bombs rip into Nigerian village marketplace
- Abduction in Mexico to spur police, judicial system changes
- Nuclear talks with Iran extended until March; GOP senators call for more sanctions
- What did Romans eat? Sewers yield ancient clues
- U.S. wants ‘to subdue’ Russia, Putin says
- Smasher yields 1st look at new particles
- Coal corruption scandal saps enthusiasm for eastern Ukraine rebels
- North Korea threatens to resume nuclear tests