Iraqi troops gear up for Fallujah assault, killing 57 militants
BAGHDAD — Iraqi troops and allied tribesmen killed 57 Islamist militants in Anbar province on Monday, the Defense Ministry said, in advance of a possible assault on the Sunni Muslim rebel-held city of Fallujah.
There was no independent verification of the toll among the militants, said to be members of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, a jihadi group fighting in the civil war in neighboring Syria.
Sunni groups angered by the Shiite Muslim-led Baghdad government overran Fallujah and parts of the nearby city of Ramadi in the western province of Anbar on Jan. 1.
The Defense Ministry statement said most of the 57 militants had been killed in the outskirts of Ramadi, but gave few details.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has held back from an all-out assault on Fallujah to allow time for a negotiated way out of the standoff, but mediation efforts appear to have failed.
Troops intensified shelling of Fallujah late Sunday, and security officials said a ground assault would follow soon.
“The assault has to take place on Fallujah, sooner or later,” said a top security official directly involved in dealing with the stand-off. “The time for talking ran out.”
The official said the army was tightening its siege of the city and would continue shelling it for at least three days to weaken militant positions and drive remaining residents out.
“We will not enter as long as there are civilians inside,” the official said on condition of anonymity. “We want them to leave, and they will leave under the pressure of daily bombardment.”
A resident of Fallujah said many families had moved to the city's western districts because other areas were being shelled, and the army was fighting militants in the north.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Saudis lead aerial attack on Yemen airports
- Germans deny helping U.S. spy in Europe
- Italy’s migrant count likely to surpass 2014’s
- Soldier’s beating video shocks Israeli leader Netanyahu
- Pope backs equal pay for women, calls wage disparity ‘pure scandal’
- Kobani refugees stranded in Turkey
- Texas Rep. McCaul seeks provision in bill to arm ISIS enemies