Bias in Israeli spy case, ex-CIA chief Woolsey says
JERUSALEM — Former CIA Director James Woolsey said on Saturday that anti-Semitism could be a factor in the United States' refusal to release a Jewish American jailed for spying for Israel.
Woolsey told Israeli Channel 10 TV that Americans who spied for other countries, including Greece, were freed after short sentences. But Jonathan Pollard remains jailed 25 years later.
Pollard was a civilian intelligence analyst for the Navy when he gave thousands of classified documents to his Israeli handlers. He was arrested in 1985 and later sentenced to life in prison.
‘‘I certainly don't think that it is universally true, but in the case of some American individuals, I think there is anti-Semitism at work here,” Woolsey said.
Others who did the same as Pollard were freed quickly, he noted.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Aid to Ukraine uncertain as its leader visits U.S.
- Al-Qaida’s South Asia wing claims 1st big strike
- With hours before secession vote, many in Scotland undecided
- Convict’s wish for assisted suicide OK’d in Belgium
- 3 troops killed in Taliban strike in Afghanistan
- Scientists snatch giant opportunity
- Scotland urged to remain in United Kingdom
- Hurricane Odile batters Mexico’s Baja California coast
- Nominees for 2 Iraqi ministries rejected
- Study: Ocean algae can evolve fast to adjust to climate change
- Afghan election losers target likely victor