Warhol portrait of Mao Zedong sells for $12.6M
LONDON — Paintings by Andy Warhol, Gerhard Richter and Jean-Michel Basquiat boosted a $146 million Sotheby's auction on Wednesday as wealthy collectors from 40 countries competed.
The tally represented an 18 percent increase from Sotheby's contemporary art auction a year ago and fell within the firm's estimated range, as 47 of 57 lots were sold.
Warhol's red 1973 portrait of Mao Zedong sold for $12.6 million, surpassing the high estimate. Three bidders, including Patti Wong, Sotheby's chairman of Asia, chased after the work that last appeared at auction in 2000, fetching 421,500 pounds. Samuel Valette, a Sotheby's senior international specialist, purchased it for a client.
“It shows how far this contemporary art market has come,” said Alexander Branczik, head of contemporary art in London for Sotheby's.
The top lot was Richter's fiery abstract painting “Wand (Wall),” which sold for $28.2 million against the presale target of more than $25 million, Sotheby's said. The auction house guaranteed the seller an undisclosed amount. Two telephone bidders pursued the 1994 canvas, rich in cadmium red and cobalt blue. It went to an undisclosed client of Cheyenne Westphal, Sotheby's head of contemporary art in Europe. The price includes commission; the estimate doesn't.
The auction began with frenzied bidding for the painting “Two Sides of the Same Coin” by Lucien Smith, 24. The bids, mostly by Sotheby's staff members, came so fast that auctioneer Oliver Barker barely had time to turn his head.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.