South African athlete Pistorius' murder trial reflects O.J. Simpson case
JOHANNESBURG — It could all hinge on the toilet door.
Oscar Pistorius goes on trial for murder on Monday, and some experts not involved in the case say the double-amputee runner could be vulnerable to a homicide conviction even if he is acquitted of murdering his girlfriend.
That's because, they say, he violated the most basic tenets of gun handling by shooting into a closed door without knowing — at least, by his account — who was behind it.
South Africa's criminal justice system and gun culture will be under a global spotlight during the Pistorius trial, which has some parallels with the O.J. Simpson case in the United States 20 years ago because of the celebrity factor, the sensational allegations and the fascination of people around the world.
Parts of the trial will be broadcast live on television, adding to the scrutiny. Simpson's trial for the killings of his ex-wife and her friend was televised in its entirety.
But in one glaring difference, Pistorius acknowledges he killed the victim. The Olympian says he thought Reeva Steenkamp was a nighttime intruder in his home in the early hours of Feb. 14 last year; the prosecution maintains he intentionally shot her several times in the bathroom because of an argument.
“They don't have to prove that this glove belongs to O.J. Simpson because it fits his hand,” said Marius du Toit, a former prosecutor, magistrate and now a criminal defense lawyer. “We know there's only one person who caused Reeva's death.”
Du Toit was referring to the leather glove that was found at the scene where Simpson's ex-wife and a man were killed in 1994. The glove seemed too tight when Simpson tried it on in court, prompting a defense lawyer to say: “If it doesn't fit, you must acquit.” Simpson was acquitted by a jury.
But prosecutors in the Pistorius case have an edge, said du Toit: “Any person that has admitted to killing another person in circumstances when your actions are unlawful will face a steep hurdle in getting off scot-free.”
Criminal law experts believe that if the prosecution fails to prove premeditated murder, firing several shots through a closed door could bring a conviction for the lesser charge of culpable homicide, a South African equivalent of manslaughter covering unintentional deaths through negligence.
Sentences in such cases range from fines to prison. They are left to courts to determine and are not set by fixed guidelines.
A key piece of evidence will be the blood spatter analysis on the inside of the toilet cubicle, said J.C. de Klerk, a ballistics expert who used to work for the South African police. He said it could give an indication of Steenkamp's position when she was shot, including whether she was sitting on the toilet or hiding behind the door as prosecutors likely suspect.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Everything is America’s fault, Putin says
- As oil prices fall, fear rises in Venezuela
- Sweden calls off search for mystery submarine
- Miss Uganda hopefuls get dirty in agriculture phase of contest
- U.S. airstrikes beat back Islamic State’s push for Mosul dam
- China to test lunar orbiter
- Canada balances security, openness
- Attack on Egypt army post in Sinai peninsula kills 30 troops
- Gunman in Ottawa attack had been waiting for passport to go to Syria
- ‘Soldier’s soldier’ Army Gen. Austin leads war on ISIS terrorists
- Cyclone relentless on India’s east coast; typhoon lashes Japan