TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

South African athlete Pistorius' murder trial reflects O.J. Simpson case

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Sunday, March 2, 2014, 6:33 p.m.
 

JOHANNESBURG — It could all hinge on the toilet door.

Oscar Pistorius goes on trial for murder on Monday, and some experts not involved in the case say the double-amputee runner could be vulnerable to a homicide conviction even if he is acquitted of murdering his girlfriend.

That's because, they say, he violated the most basic tenets of gun handling by shooting into a closed door without knowing — at least, by his account — who was behind it.

South Africa's criminal justice system and gun culture will be under a global spotlight during the Pistorius trial, which has some parallels with the O.J. Simpson case in the United States 20 years ago because of the celebrity factor, the sensational allegations and the fascination of people around the world.

Parts of the trial will be broadcast live on television, adding to the scrutiny. Simpson's trial for the killings of his ex-wife and her friend was televised in its entirety.

But in one glaring difference, Pistorius acknowledges he killed the victim. The Olympian says he thought Reeva Steenkamp was a nighttime intruder in his home in the early hours of Feb. 14 last year; the prosecution maintains he intentionally shot her several times in the bathroom because of an argument.

“They don't have to prove that this glove belongs to O.J. Simpson because it fits his hand,” said Marius du Toit, a former prosecutor, magistrate and now a criminal defense lawyer. “We know there's only one person who caused Reeva's death.”

Du Toit was referring to the leather glove that was found at the scene where Simpson's ex-wife and a man were killed in 1994. The glove seemed too tight when Simpson tried it on in court, prompting a defense lawyer to say: “If it doesn't fit, you must acquit.” Simpson was acquitted by a jury.

But prosecutors in the Pistorius case have an edge, said du Toit: “Any person that has admitted to killing another person in circumstances when your actions are unlawful will face a steep hurdle in getting off scot-free.”

Criminal law experts believe that if the prosecution fails to prove premeditated murder, firing several shots through a closed door could bring a conviction for the lesser charge of culpable homicide, a South African equivalent of manslaughter covering unintentional deaths through negligence.

Sentences in such cases range from fines to prison. They are left to courts to determine and are not set by fixed guidelines.

A key piece of evidence will be the blood spatter analysis on the inside of the toilet cubicle, said J.C. de Klerk, a ballistics expert who used to work for the South African police. He said it could give an indication of Steenkamp's position when she was shot, including whether she was sitting on the toilet or hiding behind the door as prosecutors likely suspect.

 

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read World

  1. ‘Early Mona Lisa’ painting traced to English noble
  2. China to investigate ex-leader’s top aide
  3. ISIS counterattacks refinery
  4. Vatican bureaucrats sick with power, pope says
  5. Lottery winners share $3B pot in Spain
  6. French van driver carries out 3rd attack in 3 days
  7. Tunisian election of political veteran Essebsi a return to regime
  8. Ex-Russian official warns of ‘full-fledged crisis’
  9. Pakistan fervent about anti-blasphemy law
  10. Muslim cleric gunman killed as police end standoff in Sydney cafe
  11. Arrests made in Pakistan school massacre