Despite holiday, Venezuelans continue to amass
CARACAS — Tens of thousands of students and other opponents of the Venezuelan government filled the streets of the capital on Sunday, putting a damper on President Nicolas Maduro's hopes that a mandated holiday might bring a respite from weeks of protests.
The march originated at four points near universities in Caracas that have been opposition hotbeds and converged on the Chacaito barrio, where opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez was arrested on Feb. 18, accused of incitement to violence.
Opposition leaders say the charges against Lopez are politically motivated and have demanded his release from the military prison where he is being held in isolation.
Each of the four “feeder” marches had a theme built around a complaint against the Maduro administration: justice, scarcities, freedom and censorship.
The march took place a day after the release of 41 protesters detained late Friday by authorities in Altamira Square, a focal point of opposition to Maduro.
Also on Saturday, Tachira state Gov. Jose Vielma Mora said two national guard members had been injured while trying to clear debris from streets in the state capital of San Cristobal, a scene of ongoing clashes between students and authorities.
The government said Foreign Minister Elias Jaua will meet with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in Geneva on Tuesday to discuss the situation in Venezuela. Ban has called on Maduro to open a dialogue with the opposition.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.