Egypt decrees protection for election commission
CAIRO — Egypt's interim president on Saturday issued a much-anticipated decree governing an upcoming presidential election that clears the way for a vote expected to be won by the country's military chief.
President Adly Mansour's legal adviser Ali Awad announced on state television that the elections commission would be protected from legal challenges, a contentious position opposed by one of Egypt's top courts and criticized by potential candidates.
Awad said that Mansour made the decision after reviewing all legal opinions. He said it was important to prevent delays for both the presidential and parliamentary elections, which according to the constitution must be held no later than the second half of July.
The military chief, Field Marshal Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, has been focusing on preparing an economic program, senior generals and government officials said.
The military, Egypt's most powerful institution, put its reputation on the line with an al-Sisi presidency when top generals publicly backed his candidacy in January. It too could be subject to a public backlash if his administration fails in a country that since 2011 has risen up against two presidents.
Two generals close to al-Sisi said the military was well aware of the difficulty in repairing an economy in need of reform even before the 2011 fall of longtime autocrat Hosni Mubarak and wrecked by turmoil since. The two and other government officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the candidacy.
“We love him where he is, but he has decided to jump into a fireball,” said one army general of al-Sisi, who holds the posts of defense minister, deputy prime minister and commander of the armed forces.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.