Ukraine control of bases erodes
SEVASTOPOL, Ukraine — Russia and its sympathizers seized control of more Ukrainian military bases and facilities in Crimea on Monday while Moscow issued threatening statements about eastern Ukraine that signaled Russia's intention to play a significant role in the country's future.
At least four Ukrainian military bases, including one stocked with missiles, were overrun by armed men in uniforms who say they are locals in self-defense units that are typically under the command of Russian military officers. Electricity was cut to the headquarters of the Ukrainian naval fleet, and the director of a military hospital was ousted, with a replacement installed by the pro-Russian militia that took over.
A foreboding sense of lawlessness is spreading in advance of a referendum to align with Russia that has been scheduled for Sunday. Several activists critical of Russia's presence in Crimea were reported missing. Residents of the regional capital of Simferopol reported being visited by members of committees who stole or destroyed their passports required as identification to vote.
Crimean officials are acting as if Sunday's referendum is a foregone conclusion. On a website, the Crimean parliament started to drum up support for the referendum; an online poll showed that votes to go with Russia outnumber votes to stick with Ukraine by a margin of almost three to one. Every article on the site offered a positive spin to a union with Russia, such as one describing the thousands of Russian tourists eager to vacation in Crimea.
Geoffrey Pyatt, U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, said at a news conference in Kiev that the United States will not recognize the results of the referendum.
“Any increase of the autonomy of Crimea should be done not under the barrel of a gun, but in a clear, transparent and constitutional process,” Pyatt said.
Even as Russia tightened its grip on the peninsula that is still officially part of Ukraine, it seems to be looking beyond Crimea.
First it suggested that Ukraine's new pro-Western government in Kiev was not protecting pro-Russian citizens in eastern Ukraine and was sowing “chaos.” That was an echo of accusations it has made to justify its intervention in Crimea and represents a possible pretext to intervene further in Ukraine.
Later in the day, Russian television showed Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov telling President Vladimir Putin that proposals from the United States for resolving the Ukrainian crisis were not acceptable because they recognized the legitimacy of the Kiev government. Russia has declared the government illegal, saying it rose to power in a coup that overthrew Viktor Yanukovych.
The two met in Sochi, where Putin was attending the Winter Paralympics. Lavrov said that Secretary of State John Kerry had agreed to visit Sochi for consultations but decided on Saturday to postpone the trip. Russia, Lavrov said, would come up with its own proposals, rooted in an agreement reached Feb. 21 that fell apart when protesters rejected it because it would keep Yanukovych in office until December.
In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said, “The United States needs to see concrete evidence that Russia is prepared to engage on the diplomatic proposals we have made” before negotiating further.
“The idea is to bring the situation back into the framework of international law with due account taken of the interests of all Ukrainians without exception,” Lavrov told Putin.
Earlier in the day, Lavrov's foreign ministry issued a statement accusing masked men of firing at peaceful protesters in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv.
“Russia is outraged by the chaos, which is currently ruling in eastern regions of Ukraine as a result of the actions of militants of the so-called Right Sector amid utter connivance of the new authorities, as they call themselves,” the statement said.
Witnesses have described very different scenarios, accusing pro-Russian demonstrators of attacking Ukrainian loyalists. Pro-Russian sentiment runs high in eastern Ukraine, as it does in Crimea.
A student in Kharkiv who has been monitoring events there said that on Saturday, some cars drew up at the Vladimir Lenin monument in Freedom Square, the site of an ongoing demonstration against Kiev protesters. Several people got out, waving Ukrainian and European flags, and started arguing with the demonstrators. One of the men from the cars fired a pistol in the air before driving away. No one was injured, according to the student, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.
In a second incident on Saturday evening, masked men accosted a group of three anti-Kiev protesters and shot and wounded one of them.
On Monday, Vitaly Klitschko, a boxer who helped lead the protests against Yanukovych and who is running for president, visited Kharkiv, addressed a pro-Kiev crowd and was pelted with eggs by pro-Russian demonstrators.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.