Teen's death revives Turkish street demonstrations
By Ali Abaday| Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 1:51 p.m.
ISTANBUL, Turkey — The death on Tuesday of a 15-year-old boy who accidentally got caught in the fighting between protesters and police here last summer has revived street demonstrations.
Berkin Elvan had been in a coma since June 2013, when he was struck in the head by a gas canister during a police crackdown on protesters. He had been on an errand to buy bread just as police moved against protesters in Istanbul's Okmeydani neighborhood.
Elvan had since become a prime symbol in Turkey of the violence faced by protesters throughout nationwide demonstrations.
His family announced Elvan's death via Twitter: “To our people: We lost our son Berkin Elvan at 7 a.m. in the morning. Condolences to us all.”
Separately, his mother Gülsüm Elvan criticized the ruling government for her son's death.
“It is not Allah who has taken my son away,” she said. “It is [Prime Minister Recep] Tayyip Erdogan.”
Erdogan had memorably praised police for “heroic action” during the Gezi resistance in June, despite deaths and serious injuries sustained by protesters.
Since Elvan's death, university students and protesters have taken to the streets in cities around the country. In Istanbul, two separate groups of protesters are publicly mourning his death, with police trying to control the crowds by shutting down access to some streets.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.