Russia decries U.S. 'insults' at United Nations
UNITED NATIONS — Russia and the United States exchanged threats on Wednesday in a tense U.N. Security Council meeting over the Ukraine crisis, with the Russian envoy saying the U.S. ambassador's “insults” are jeopardizing Moscow's willingness to cooperate with Washington on other diplomatic matters.
It was the council's eighth meeting in three weeks on Ukraine, a show of determination by Western powers, even if the council is powerless to act because of Moscow's veto power as a permanent council member.
Meanwhile, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon left for Russia and Ukraine in a bid to seek a diplomatic way out of the crisis.
Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin celebrated the treaty signed a day earlier by President Vladimir Putin declaring Crimea part of Russia.
“Yesterday, something truly historic happened,” Churkin declared.
U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power warned Russia, two days after the West imposed sanctions, that the United States and its allies “are prepared to take additional steps.” She compared Russia's takeover of Crimea with theft.
“A thief can steal property, but that does not confer the right of ownership on the thief,” she said.
The Russian ambassador shot back: “It is simply unacceptable to listen to these insults addressed to our country.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. airstrikes beat back Islamic State’s push for Mosul dam
- Canadians more fearful, aware after ‘very rare’ attack in Ottawa
- China’s Communist Party angles to improve judiciary
- Gunman in Ottawa attack had been waiting for passport to go to Syria
- Saudis tell women: Don’t defy and drive
- Deadly crash into train station prompts crackdown in Jerusalem
- Teen girls found no roadblock to flights
- 2 dead in shooting attack at Canada’s Parliament
- NATO chases Russian aircraft
- Loophole rewards expelled Nazi suspects with Social Security benefits
- Abbas seems desperate in round of belligerent rhetoric