Iran stands by choice as envoy to United Nations
TEHRAN, Iran — Iran on Saturday said it would not name a new diplomat to represent it at the United Nations, with one lawmaker urging the Islamic Republic to stand up to “bullying” from the United States.
The Obama administration said Friday that the United States had informed Iran it would not grant a visa to Hamid Aboutalebi, a member of the group responsible for the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.
Iranian state television anchors discussed the rejection, with a crawl at the bottom of the screen reading: “The Foreign Ministry says Aboutalebi is Iran's only choice as its U.N. envoy.”
Prominent lawmaker Alaeddin Boroujerdi said the United States had no right to intervene in Iran's U.N. envoy pick.
“Naming Aboutalebi as Iran's U.N. envoy has nothing to do with the U.S.,” he said.
“American opposition to Aboutalebi's entry is a misuse of the geographical location of the U.N.,” the Iranian parliament's website quoted Boroujerdi as saying Saturday. “The Iranian government should stand up to this U.S. bullying.”
Boroujerdi, who heads the Iranian parliament's national security and foreign policy committee, urged Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif to write to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to fight the U.S. decision.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Watchdog counts $1 billion wasted in Afghanistan
- Turkey releases recording of warnings to Russian plane
- France, Russia iron out alliance against Islamic State
- Year’s worth of rain floods Qatar
- Pope Francis plugs global climate talks in Kenya visit
- Mexico seizes El Chapo’s planes, cars, houses
- Russia vows to punish Turks financially
- China to reorganize military under joint command
- South African judge OKs local trade in rhino horns
- Noncombat deadly for military civilians working in Afghanistan
- Slaying in Venezuela spurs fears of political violence